Six Degrees of Social Influence: Science, Application, and the Psychology of Robert Cialdini

Six Degrees of Social Influence Science Application and the Psychology of Robert Cialdini None

None

  • Six Degrees of Social Influence: Science, Application, and the Psychology of Robert Cialdini Best Download || [Douglas T. Kenrick Noah J. Goldstein Sanford L. Braver]
    445 Douglas T. Kenrick Noah J. Goldstein Sanford L. Braver
Six Degrees of Social Influence: Science, Application, and the Psychology of Robert Cialdini

  1. Douglas T. Kenrick Noah J. Goldstein Sanford L. Braver says:
    Professor of Psychology at Arizona State University His research and writing integrate three scientific syntheses of the last few decades evolutionary psychology, cognitive science, and dynamical systems theory He is author of over 170 scientific articles, books, and book chapters, the majority applying evolutionary ideas to human cognition and behavior.His father and brother both spent several years in Sing Sing, but he broke the family tradition and went to graduate school to study psychology He studied social psychology under Robert B Cialdini and received his Ph.D from Arizona State University in 1976 He has edited several books on evolutionary psychology, contributed chapters to the Handbook of Social Psychology and the Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, and been an author of two multi edition textbooks Psychology, with John Seamon and Social Psychology Goals in Interaction, with Steven Neuberg and Robert B Cialdini He writes a blog for Psychology Today magazine, titled Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life He has a forthcoming book of the same title.

429 Reply to “Six Degrees of Social Influence: Science, Application, and the Psychology of Robert Cialdini”

  1. The book consists of 14 Chapters, each an essay written by Cialdini s fellow researchers in his honor.From summarizing findings about something, to proposing how social psychology research should proceed, there are various topics being treated in this book.Since I m no psychologist, I couldn t really appreciate chapter 12 at all, being way technical than the rest of the writings I also found chapters 1 and 14 to be or less on the same line, though both fathomable than chapter 12 i.e something [...]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *